Fowlers Fury | 04/10/2023 20:49:47 |
![]() 446 forum posts 88 photos | Attn: "Chuffer" One of them made me realise I'd been unclear yet again. I don't know if GM castings were worse in terms of porosity in past years. Those very porous castings I purchased must have dated from the late 1970s. I don't know from where the original purchaser acquired them, but from his location I suspect they were "from a M.E. supplier" in the north. I had no original receipt so returning them wasn't an option.. Of course many hours of machining had been completed when the porosity was first identified, so no-cost, GM replacements weren't my priority !
|
duncan webster | 04/10/2023 21:02:11 |
5307 forum posts 83 photos | when I worked in high vacuum field, all ally forgings were sealed by putting them in an evacuated chamber and letting them outgas for a bit, then a bucket of resin, was posted in through an airlock and the forgings immersed, then let the air in slowly, fish them out and let it harden. I doubt the resin would stand steam temperature. This is all a long time ago, so might be not quite right I've had just as much trouble with iron castings as with gunmetal with porosity. I put a thin sleeve made from cored bronze in my latest, although I doubt they would have leaked like Furious Fowler's, just a bit of porosity at one end of the bore spoiling the finish |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.