Chris TickTock | 30/08/2019 11:21:56 |
622 forum posts 46 photos | Posted by SillyOldDuffer on 30/08/2019 09:02:10:
Putting threads into context:
Navigating this mess can be a problem for hobbyists. Trying to follow an old British or new American Project Book can be deeply confusing. What made sense in 1949 may not in 2019, and stuff easily obtained in the USA may be hard to find in Europe. I'd recommend going metric if general purpose making or repairing new equipment is your bag. Makes more sense to go Imperial if renovating old equipment, building models to Imperial Plans, or grandad gives you a fully equipped Imperial workshop. There are hobbyists who need to work with both systems, and it's certainly possible to do metric work on an imperial lathe and vice versa. Less amusing if you have to buy full sets of Imperial and Metric drills, taps, dies, spanners etc. because it soon gets expensive. As a budding clockmaker, before tooling up, it's worth looking at a number of designs to see what threads are recommended and trying to standardise. It's unlikely any clock plans will call for Whitworth! American designs might call for UNF, British for BA, and German metric. Actually it may not matter much because designs can be tweaked to use any thread system, but it's all time and trouble. I'd be interested to hear from proper Horologists which thread system(s) they use in practice? Dave Great post Dave somewhat spoilt by introducing provocative terms. Horology is such a broad subject that to be a master would take more than a lifetime. I for one with but a few years experience with clocks understand this. But then what makes a 'proper' horologist or 'proper' machinist come to that is difficult to define and why on a forum would we wish to.. much better not to use such language. Any antique clock repair man should know there are all manner of threads used and often clock makers used their own threads. Chris |
SillyOldDuffer | 30/08/2019 15:21:42 |
10668 forum posts 2415 photos | Posted by Chris TickTock on 30/08/2019 11:21:56:
Posted by SillyOldDuffer on 30/08/2019 09:02:10:....
Dave Great post Dave somewhat spoilt by introducing provocative terms. Horology is such a broad subject that to be a master would take more than a lifetime. I for one with but a few years experience with clocks understand this. But then what makes a 'proper' horologist or 'proper' machinist come to that is difficult to define and why on a forum would we wish to.. much better not to use such language. ... Chris Whoops, I was trying not to be provocative! Was it describing British Workmen as too thick to understand metric, or calling the multitude of conflicting standards a mess, or 'Proper Horologist' that touched a nerve? I stand by what I said: thread standards are a mess and here's the opinion of the 'First Report of the BA Small Screws Committee (1882) : 'The question of the introduction of the metrical system occupied the serious consideration of the committee, but, considering the fact that it is not generally adopted in engineering or manufacture in England, and that it is as yet little understood by our workmen, it was thought better to suggest no change in this direction.' By 'Proper Horologist' I simply meant anyone who knows more about clocks than me! Although interested in the theory and history of clocks I've never made one myself, apart from Meccano and electronic. So my views on clock threads in the real world are inferior to those of anyone who has actually built a clock. In general I'm massively ignorant on ways and means compared with any forum member doing serious clock making. That's why I asked the question, and I think Michael gave a good answer. Dave
Edited By SillyOldDuffer on 30/08/2019 15:23:33 |
Howard Lewis | 31/08/2019 12:33:31 |
7227 forum posts 21 photos | Standardising threads , as Whitworth and Maudslay did, greatly simplified life. Others came after and made improvements that suited their particular needs. Until then, it was the whim of the local blacksmith, as to what he made. We use a "standard" thread because it it is simpler for us to interface with others. If you want to make your product unique, (so that you have sole control of the aftermarket, you build in a unique feature, such as the need for a 7mm Allen Key to service the brakes, or a unique thread.. You could go for a 12mm x 8 tpi. with an angle of 45 degrees,for instance). But for the rest of us, standardisation makes life much easier! Hence our need for thread gauges, to help identify the thread standard with which we are dealing. But "oddballs" will crop up. Such as the 1.125 inch x 12 tpi used by Myford, which over the years, has effectively become a standard. Ditto for Boxford, or Raglan with their threads. My lathe mandrel is 2.25 inch x 8 tpi Whit form, which may be described a standard, IF you happen to have one of its clones or derivatives. The thread for a drain plunger, at least in UK, is 3/4 x 7 tpi Whit form. Try cutting one 1/2 inch long! Europe still uses BSP in the guise of Gas. Enough of my ramblings Howard |
Chris TickTock | 31/08/2019 20:56:03 |
622 forum posts 46 photos | Posted by Howard Lewis on 31/08/2019 12:33:31:
Standardising threads , as Whitworth and Maudslay did, greatly simplified life. Others came after and made improvements that suited their particular needs. Until then, it was the whim of the local blacksmith, as to what he made. We use a "standard" thread because it it is simpler for us to interface with others. If you want to make your product unique, (so that you have sole control of the aftermarket, you build in a unique feature, such as the need for a 7mm Allen Key to service the brakes, or a unique thread.. You could go for a 12mm x 8 tpi. with an angle of 45 degrees,for instance). But for the rest of us, standardisation makes life much easier! Hence our need for thread gauges, to help identify the thread standard with which we are dealing.
Howard you are a gem and plainly a font of knowledge. Regards Chris But "oddballs" will crop up. Such as the 1.125 inch x 12 tpi used by Myford, which over the years, has effectively become a standard. Ditto for Boxford, or Raglan with their threads. My lathe mandrel is 2.25 inch x 8 tpi Whit form, which may be described a standard, IF you happen to have one of its clones or derivatives. The thread for a drain plunger, at least in UK, is 3/4 x 7 tpi Whit form. Try cutting one 1/2 inch long! Europe still uses BSP in the guise of Gas. Enough of my ramblings Howard
|
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.