By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more

Member postings for Paul Atkin

Here is a list of all the postings Paul Atkin has made in our forums. Click on a thread name to jump to the thread.

Thread: Long Term Planning for a Workshop Size
20/01/2014 22:35:16

Wow, thanks for all the help again.

JasonB & Stub Mandrel - Thanks for the explanation on the flywheel size. As for the future, I know that this, like any hobby can grab you and suck you in so I have to be strong and set my limits somewhere. Remember, at the moment I am not buying machinery - that will hopefully come later, my first job is to arrange the necessary space so based on what you have told me, I will work on the basis of a 250mm (10 inch) swing lathe with 550mm center distance for sizing the workshop.

Bazyle - I get the weight thing but when I look at various lathe and mill sizes, the weight seems to take an enormous leap from the 40-50kg range up to 150-160kg with nothing between, especially with the models I see here in Japan. My "workshop" is likely to be some form of shed without a solid floor - see the link below, this might be okay for the smaller machines, but for 150kg I will certainly need to put more thought into foundations. I can't pour concrete because my house is rented, I would probably need to lay paving slabs and rest the floor of the shed onto them, or leave out the floor and just build the shed around a paving slab base.

OMG - Thanks for the hints on the drill, I will plan to keep space for it at this time.

This has all been very helpful, thank you all. I will now need to confirm machine dimensions and make a floor plan with adequate working space so I can search for a suitable shed. Something like this which is 3.1m x 2.6 giving 81sq ft of floorspace

20/01/2014 15:56:25

Thanks to all for the quick answers.

Just to paint the picture a little more, I am from the UK but actually live in Japan and believe me, there is no such thing as planning permission here. It seems that as long as your buildings are not actually overhanging your neighbour's property then all is cool. Having said that a half garage or 10'x8' shed would be easy to do.

As far as equipment is concerned, being here I am fairly limited on choice as model engineering is not so big it seems. A Myford would be impossible for sure. As in the UK, the only machine tools that are at all affordable are imported Chinese, probably from the same factory. Here are a couple of links to some Japanese companies, the pictures are quite self explanatory.

As far as I can tell, this "Mothmach" brand  http://www.senban.jp/product/PSF385VD.html is almost identical to the Warco models in the UK. http://item.rakuten.co.jp/auc-himitsukichi/c/0000000304/ This one has 250mm (diameter) swing and 400mm between centers weighing in at . (all metric here of course!!)

Then, this model http://www.senban.jp/product/PSL550VDR.html also with 250mm swing but with 550mm between centers is supplied by a company that does a complete re-build of machines as seen here http://www.senban.jp/target/inspection_l.html

On the mill, again same story with imports. It seems that this one is almost identical to the Sieg X2 http://www.senban.jp/product/PSF385VD.html and at 50kg, I could actually install this in my current hobby room indoors, but if I had to go up a size, then it is a huge jump in weight and it must be in an outbuilding. Again, that company seems to do some quite impressive tuning as seen here http://www.senban.jp/target/inspection_f.html

I had thought about a grinder, but it is tiny. Regarding the pedestal drill, is it strictly necessary when having a nice mill available?

Coming back to lathe size again, for a 7 inch flywheel you guys seem to be suggesting a 10 inch swing. Having that extra capacity makes working a bit easier I assume so as not to be working at the limits of the machine, correct? The reason I ask is because both those companies make lathes with 180mm swing (7 inches) which are much smaller and less than half the weight of the 10 inch swing machines. There seems to be a huge jump in size and weight which is the main reason why I started the topic.

Edited By Paul Atkin on 20/01/2014 16:01:16

20/01/2014 06:12:42

Currently I tinker with a little Unimat 3 in a spare bedroom. The modelling bug is with me but currently I have no space to expand, so as a long term project I want to build a workshop in the garden and stock it with a lathe and mill capable of doing "real" work.

As a reference, my ultimate aim would be to have a lathe and mill capable of machining something like the Stuart Models Victoria Twin http://www.stuartmodels.com/inprod_det.cfm/section/casting/mod_id/47 or similar

This has; Length 15.5 inch, Flywheel diameter 7 inch, bore 1 inch and stroke 2 inch.

My question is what size machines would I need in order to achieve this? The lathe I can understand pretty well, but I'm not sure about a suitable capacity mill.

Once I understand the machine sizes, I can start planning and budgeting the building of the workshop.

 

Any advice would be gratefully received.

Edited By Paul Atkin on 20/01/2014 06:13:19

Thread: Metric vs Imperial - Practical or Traditional?
19/08/2009 01:04:57
Meyrick,
Yes as I mentioned in my opening post - most industrial pipe sizes are still in inches.
 
Peter,
Maybe its just me and the fact that I live overseas which causes me to be more sensitive to the variations.  I hate the fact that there are so many different standards.  Its simply not efficient or convenient and must cost industry billions of pounds per day on a global scale.
 
Its not only metric vs imperial, there are deg Celsius vs Fahrenheit (why does the BBC still quote degF??), differing TV systems, NTSC vs PAL, different voltages and frequencies, different connectors for a mutlitude of electrical devices, incompatible computer software, proprietary designs such as memory cards for digital cameras, region coding for DVD's, BluRay vs HDDVD, Shoe sizing, Imperial gallons vs US gallons........ ARRGGHHHH Rant! Rant! Rant!
 
If I am thinking only about modelling then the fact that I could buy one metric set of drills, taps and dies is surely far more efficient than having to buy 2 of everything (or more if you start considering whitworth, BA etc).  And then there's storage space which is at a premium for any but the luckiest of modelllers.  I have a multi drawer case with all my metric cap heads, nuts, washers, spring washers in from 2mm up to 10mm all arranged in spearate drawers.  I would need to at least double or treble my storage capacity to work with even one or two of the other "standards", and that's only one simple example.
 
And one more point Peter, however the metric system was developed, it cannot be worse than using 3 grains of barleycorn to set the "standard" inch. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inch
 
Please excuse me,  I just get so annoyed by the sheer inconvenience of it all..........
17/08/2009 23:36:57
Many of the comments above simply point out the difficulties when using two systems - which was the point I was trying to make.
 
As for the comments on use of meters and millimeters on the same drawing, that is simply bad design practice and is no different than using two different units on an imperial drawing.  It has no relevance to the question of metric vs imperial.
 
But talk of construction and pipework where you are dealing with an existing infrastructure is entirely different and understandably difficult to transition.  But it can be done, where I live, ALL DIY projects such as house construction, garden components and pipework are entirely metric.
 
When a one off component is manufactured on a lathe or mill as is done in modelling, then there is really no logical reason I can see to use inches.  The only non-standard part I can see would be for the use of some modified BA nuts which I believe have a more scale like appearance - but then would it not be possible for a model supplier to manufacture scale nuts based on metric threads?
 
Which brings me around to my opening question - is it a matter of practicality or traditionalism? (or as I would prefer to call it - sheer bloody mindedness)
17/08/2009 14:25:22
Some interesting points, but I would take exception to the comment;
 
Posted by its-smee on 17/08/2009 08:38:00:

Part of the problem is europe. - they can only use metric, so want the world to change to suit them.  We are suffering from "creeping metrication" on a massive scale but no one has recognised this fact.
As a point of interest try dividing a metric measurement by three.   ----    now you see why imperial is best.   
 
 It's nothing to do with Europe - I work in Japan - it's been metric for over 100 years, so to is ALL of Asia, India, Africa the Middle East & South America.
 
 Why so anti metric?  The sooner the USA and to a lesser extent the UK catches up with the rest of the world and we get one standard easier it would be.  Anyone read about the Gimli Glider?  Even NASA have finally realized this after crashing a couple of spacecraft.
 
Well, I would like to see how you would split an inch into 3?  Would that be 2 and a bit eighths, or 5 and a bit 16ths or 333.33333333 recurring  thou?
 
17/08/2009 03:18:36
I served my apprenticeship in the UK back in the late 1970's / early 80's and at engineering college we studied on a combination of metric and imperial machine tools - but only because they had a lot of older machines that had been donated.  Unfortunately my career took me away from hands on work and since then I have worked overseas in engineering where 100% metric dimensioning is used except in pipe threads.
 
I recently acquired a small hobby lathe from a very good friend which I shall soon be using with my hobby of Radio Control helicopters and planes so my interest on reading up what my new toy could do led to a study of what is happening on the internet.
 
I must say that I was shocked that to find that even though over 30 years have passed, so many people still seem to be working in non metric terms.  I even found this at a major supplier such as RDG Tools - many of their products are only listed in inch sizes.
 
For me, returning to a world of inches and thousandths is too horrible to contemplate, I don't own any imperial drills or taps / dies.  I can no longervisualize what 5/16" looks like for example.
 
So my question is, why are inches still so popular for model engineers? 
- Is it for some practical reason of sizing and scaling? 
- Is it that our American cousins refuse to change their ways? 
- Or is it that many of the people writing articles are of the pre-metric generation and are still more comfortable thinking in traditional terms?
Magazine Locator

Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!

Find Model Engineer & Model Engineers' Workshop

Sign up to our Newsletter

Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.

You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy

Latest Forum Posts
Support Our Partners
cowells
Sarik
MERIDIENNE EXHIBITIONS LTD
Subscription Offer

Latest "For Sale" Ads
Latest "Wanted" Ads
Get In Touch!

Do you want to contact the Model Engineer and Model Engineers' Workshop team?

You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.

Click THIS LINK for full contact details.

For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.

Digital Back Issues

Social Media online

'Like' us on Facebook
Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter
 Twitter Logo

Pin us on Pinterest

 

Donate

donate