Here is a list of all the postings Mark Huskie has made in our forums. Click on a thread name to jump to the thread.
Thread: Replacing a Canon printer with a Brother Laser? |
04/04/2021 21:04:15 |
Posted by mark costello 1 on 04/04/2021 20:47:08:
I am thinking of replacing My Canon printer with a Brother Laser printer, need black only. Experience or advice wanted. Better brand? Comments? Good evening, I replaced my HP laser with a Brother BW laser because the HP was always losing the wifi connection, since then I have been very happy with the Brother, no lost connections, good print and fairly priced consumables, Best wishes, Mark |
Thread: 1.1 kw brushed motor Torque |
01/04/2021 20:18:46 |
Good evening, After taking in all what has been said in relation to my question I have ordered the Optimum 2406V, whilst it may not be perfect it will very likely fill my requirements. As someone said all lathes are a compromise at a certain level so making a decision may not be easy but a decision has to be made! Thanks to each and everyone for their kind input, I shall update this thread once my new toy is up and running, delivery in two weeks time, getting it down to my basement and up on the work bench may take longer Have a nice Easter weekend, Mark |
31/03/2021 20:17:08 |
Posted by old mart on 31/03/2021 20:10:32:
I wonder if anyone has changed the belts and pulleys on one of these lathes to give lower speeds and more torque? A very good point and one that I would be very interested in,
Mark |
30/03/2021 16:44:55 |
Posted by Dave Halford on 30/03/2021 14:42:38:
Things were much simpler when motors were rated in HP, everyone knew what was meant. Now we get power (any power mechanical or electrical) is only in KW and yet randomly checking ebay if you buy a motor on it's own they are listed both ways such as 0.75kw - 1HP so clearly output and you understand what you are getting. One wonders why some machine tool suppliers or the manufacturers feel the need to inflate the figures.
Mark, There are suppliers out there who still supply new machines with old school belt drives for spindle speed so the motor always runs at full revs Hi Dave, yes I agree, confusing is a nice way of putting it, I detest glossy marketing figures, comparing apples to apples would be so simple and nice! As for belt driven lathes I have closely looked at them but I find variable speed control to be so much more convenient, a form of laziness I guess, remember wind up car windows I am going to revisit the Optimum as it's two speed ratios may be just the job after all. At the same time I will try to fully understand what my present and future needs are or will be, I may have been seeing problems where none really existed! Thanks again and have a good eving, Maek |
30/03/2021 13:57:20 |
Posted by JasonB on 30/03/2021 13:02:52:
Mark, regarding the SC2. it has to have 500w motor as there is no secondary reduction due to it being direct drive from motor to spindle. The makers have to put in motor with a sufficiently high max power to compensate for when it is running at say 25% or less when using the lathe at low speed. The Optimum and similar machine shave two speed ranges in the region of 50-1000 and 100-2000. This means that the motor can be run closer to it's max power when the speed is dropped As an example I have 2 Seig manual mills the Brushless SX2.7 (750w) with one fixed ratio will stall if I run a 100mm slitting saw at calculated cutting speed. The Brushed X3 (600W) won't yet it has a less powerful motor but it will cut as it has a high and low ratio so I'm able to run the motor faster relative to spindle speed and get into the power band. Also worth pointing out that the requirement for a shallow cut at low speed really only applies as the diameter gets towards the lathe's maximum, I said earlier that 0.025" depth of cut was about the comfortable max on a 9-10" flywheel.This is a piece of 1" steel being reduced to 1/2" dia so 0.250" depth pf cut in one pass, Not something I would do every day but useful to explore the machines limits Edited By JasonB on 30/03/2021 13:15:11 Hi Jason, Many thanks for the detailed reply, the forum is certainly a great source of knowledge! I must admit I am coming round to reconsidering the Optimum after having digested some of the wisdom available here. As you rightly say the problem may only occur at near to maximum diameter, not something that I am likely to be confronted with on a regular basis. A lathe for home use certainly seems to involve compromise, choosing the right compromise is the trick of course, I will post an update after I finally order a lathe, hopefully that will be soon! Best wishes, Mark |
30/03/2021 11:09:39 |
Posted by SillyOldDuffer on 30/03/2021 09:58:04:
Posted by Mark Huskie on 30/03/2021 08:25:18:
Posted by not done it yet on 29/03/2021 13:46:44:
The OP should not assume the motor output power is 1.1kW unless specifically stated. That 1.1kW might be the input power - and some of that would be turned into heat within the motor. When the motor is turning more slowly, that heat will not be dissipated as easily as at full speed. The swing of a lathe is often quoted as twice the centre height. That is not quite true - it may depend on the gap between the ways. Small difference, but when things get tight.... Good morning, further to our earlier exchange it seems that the 1.1 Kw figured quoted for the motor is not the motor power output (P2) but the motor power requirements! The actual power output is 750w. It seems that there are one or two suppliers who insist on using this fairly confusing method of specifying their products. It certainly makes you appreciate companies such as ARC and Paulimot (amongst others) who specify power output. Needless to sayI will not being pursuing this purchase. Oh well back to the internet for more research! Have a good day! Whoa! Slow down. Wrote a longish post about motor power the other day, but never mind, it was boring and I won't repeat it. Instead, ask yourself the questions: 'How fast do I need to cut metal', and 'does the extra time taken by a 0.75kW rather than a 1.1kW motor matter?' I wish machine tool adverts quoted both input and output power plus the graph needed to relate input power to torque over a speed range, but alas they rarely do. So, unless it says otherwise, best assume the power advertised is Input and that the motor isn't continuously rated. (Duty cycle is far more important than power rating, because it limits how long a motor will run before overheating. A motor rated at 750W input continuous, is likely 'better' than a 1.5kW output motor, 25% duty cycle.) Murky waters, but in practice it may not make much difference in a hobby workshop, even though I'm more attracted to vendors quoting honest output power rather than sales speak. For what it's worth, a wattmeter on my 1.5kW hobby lathe, a WM280, shows it's difficult to take cuts deep enough to fully load the motor. Apart from the unpleasant spray of red-hot chips it produces, the lathe isn't quite rigid enough to be worked that hard. Putting a bigger motor on this model would probably be a pointless waste of money. The only valid reason I can think of is to maximise low speed torque, but some sort of back-gear would be a lot more effective if a lot of slow cutting is on the agenda. Bear in mind a motor rated at 750W out will deliver more power than that in short bursts, which may be 'good enough': just be careful not to overheat the motor and electronics. There is no perfect lathe, especially when held back by budget and location. Whatever you get will be a compromise, it's just that some will be closer to what you need than others. My advice, don't dismiss options too quickly! Dave
Edited By SillyOldDuffer on 30/03/2021 10:01:48 Good morning, Thanks for the reply and very relevant comments, I would not be totally honest if I did not say that there was a bit of a knee jerk reaction to my decision to not purchase the Optimum, I too have clear preference for open and transparent manufacturers and it annoys me that when I was actually one click away from buying this lathe when this fairly important point arose, my (potential) supplier was open about it but said this was the way the manufacture works with regard to motor power specifications. As mentioned earlier I had a Sieg SC2 (400mm point to point version) and this had a 500w power output motor, I was therefore looking for something more powerful for what would be a substantially larger capacity lathe. I looked at the SC4 and apart from the 105mm height above the bed it suited my requirements, as you say there is no perfect lathe and obviously I will have to compromise somewhere. I will reflect on the matter and see which way the cards fall, in any case time marches on and I "need" a lathe many thanks for the reply, best wishes Mark |
30/03/2021 08:25:18 |
Posted by not done it yet on 29/03/2021 13:46:44:
The OP should not assume the motor output power is 1.1kW unless specifically stated. That 1.1kW might be the input power - and some of that would be turned into heat within the motor. When the motor is turning more slowly, that heat will not be dissipated as easily as at full speed. The swing of a lathe is often quoted as twice the centre height. That is not quite true - it may depend on the gap between the ways. Small difference, but when things get tight.... Good morning, further to our earlier exchange it seems that the 1.1 Kw figured quoted for the motor is not the motor power output (P2) but the motor power requirements! The actual power output is 750w. It seems that there are one or two suppliers who insist on using this fairly confusing method of specifying their products. It certainly makes you appreciate companies such as ARC and Paulimot (amongst others) who specify power output. Needless to sayI will not being pursuing this purchase. Oh well back to the internet for more research! Have a good day! |
29/03/2021 15:35:49 |
Posted by not done it yet on 29/03/2021 13:46:44:
The OP should not assume the motor output power is 1.1kW unless specifically stated. That 1.1kW might be the input power - and some of that would be turned into heat within the motor. When the motor is turning more slowly, that heat will not be dissipated as easily as at full speed. The swing of a lathe is often quoted as twice the centre height. That is not quite true - it may depend on the gap between the ways. Small difference, but when things get tight.... Good afternoon, thanks for the advice, the figure quoted are from the sellers site and translated from German, the motor output power is listed as 1.1kw and the centre height 125mm with a maximum diameter workpiece of 250mm. this will be confirmed before I put and hard earned cash down, cheers, Mark |
29/03/2021 15:29:13 |
Posted by JasonB on 29/03/2021 13:22:42:
Well I was going by the previous post that mentioned a Myford which I doubt will be able to remove as much metal as yours. Maybe a Myford owner could comment on what feeds, speeds and DOC they would use on a 9" flywheel casting particularly with HSS but even if I'm using 1/4 of the DOC that they would be using the fact I'm running at 300rpm rather than 40 means I'm able to take 7.5 cuts in the same amount of time as it won't take them to do one deeper cut. Actually quite pleased with what Mine is removing in those videos 10.5" dia, 300rpm, 0.025" DOC 0.003"/rev is approx 0.75cu in/min considering it's at 1/3rd power and we know Warco have a habit of quoting input power not what the motor puts out. As for turning capacity, having has a lathe that could only turn upto 8" diameter for a number of years it was very limiting in the choice of stationary engine models that were available this is mostly due to designs being produced that could be built on a Myford which had a narrow gap bed which was able to accomodate the common 9" flywheels seen on many models. So Mark, if your main interest is in stationaly steam then I would look to something that can swing 9.5 - 10" which puts you into the "240-250" size lathes if looking for new. Hi Jason, many thanks for the reply, it looks as though I will buy the Optimum because of the centre height, it gives me the capacity to turn 9" flywheels if I choose to. The way I look at it is if I buy a smaller capacity lathe I am stuck with it, if I buy the bigger capacity lathe and, at some time in the future, find that the motor is under powered then I can consider changing the motor, not likely to be honest but at least it gives me the option! Thanks! |
29/03/2021 11:27:55 |
Dear all, Many thanks for the quick replies! for the threading speed I appreciate the downside of the lowest speed but I tend not to single point threads. As for large flywheels it is not something that I plan to do everday day or even every year? But on the Polly models site there seems to be quite a few stationary engines with 9" flywheels so I would like to be able to join in the fun. So I guess that it should not be a problem so long as I use carbide tooling with a bit more revs, comforting to know! For the swing centre height I guess that it is a further example of two countries separated by a common language? I will use the UK version in future. For information I have recently sold my Sieg SC3 (500w P2) and was quite happy turning flywheels within it's capacity, however as most of you know once you have a lathe you will soon want a bigger one Thanks again, Cheers, Mark |
29/03/2021 10:27:20 |
Good day all, I am thinking of buying a new lathe, as I live in Switzerland the choice has been narrowed to either the Sieg SC4 or the Optimum 2406v, Whilst the SC4 has a lot going for it the bed swing (105mm) is a bit limiting, for say a 9 inch flywheel, therefore I am leaning towards the Optimum (125mm swing), however the 2406v comes with 1.1 kw (P2) brushed motor with two speed ranges by belt change. lower range 150-1200 rpm My questions is the following:- will there be enough torque available of low rpm (300) to turn a 9 inch cast iron flywheel? I am not worried about taking heavy cuts as time is not an issue, Any comments would be most appreciated! Best wishes, Mark |
Thread: Sieg SC4 Pro |
20/03/2021 19:27:27 |
Good evening Howard, I would certainly appreciate Ketan's point of view concerning this machine, as for a market I know at least one interested customer! Concerning delivery I live in Switzerland and so Germany is quite convenient, and relatively cheap, for deliveries. As a comparison I can have the Sieg SC4 and accessories, delivered to my home for €148, to have a much lighter mill delivered from the UK was much more expensive. I am torn between the Siec SC4 and the Optimum 2406, the Optimum has a bigger swing but the SIeg has other features, to make things worse they now throw the Sieg SC4 Pro into the mix! Oh well, such is life! Cheers, Mark |
19/03/2021 20:07:25 |
Hi Jason, thanks for the reply, the website specifications lists an Android tablet:- "Upgraded Features SC4 pro compared to SC4: 1. Upgraded front control panel 2. New rigid splash guard 3. QCTP- Quick change tool post 250-111 4. High grade aluminum knob & handwheel 5. Top side DRO, 6. tailstock DRO 7. 2 axis DRO (magnetic scale rails on bed and cross slide, inside bluetooth generator, Android tablet)" Whether this has been lost in translation is another question although the picture on the website does show a tablet in place:- https://www.sieg-machines.de/navi.php?a=22448&lang=eng In any case an interesting development! Have a good evening! Mark
|
19/03/2021 19:34:59 |
Good evening, whilst looking for a new lathe I came across the web site for SIEG in Germany, they have a SIEG SC4 Pro listed, the machine has a redesigned control panel, Bluetooth DRO, digital readouts for the compound and Tailstock, QCTP and a smaller splash back so probably no milling attachment. Seems like a nice machine to me. Has anyone heard of this machine or have any comments? I asked Paulimot in Germany if they planned to stock this machine but apparently they do not have any plans to do so. Cheers, Mark |
Thread: ArcEurotrade machine deliveries to Switzerland |
08/06/2020 14:15:42 |
Posted by JasonB on 08/06/2020 11:49:13:
I think Ketan (owner of ARC) has posted before about not shipping machines overseas, he may add something here. Is there not another distributor in Europe you could try, Sieg list them here
Hi, thanks for the reply, I am pretty sure that I could have found another distributor but I tend to do a lot of "homework" regarding problems and reputations of dealers and distributors hence my original decision to go with ARC. As I thought that I had already "put this baby to bed". I lack both the time and courage to start over. WABECO also seem decent to deal with so I went with them, maybe not the most logical of argument, certainly from a financial point of view, but it works for me best wishes, Mark |
08/06/2020 13:08:05 |
Posted by Barrie Lever on 08/06/2020 13:02:23:
Mark I often wish I was In Switzerland !! I holiday there sometimes in the summer and occasionally go to Lausanne for activities relating to the FAI. I will be travelling to Lausanne again soon (2021) for committee work relating to International aeromodelling at the FAI. I stay at the Hotel du Port, very close to the fountains by the paddle steamer jetty. Have another think about ISO 30 the benefits are good and you are only talking about a couple of extra tool holders really. Best Regards Barrie Hi Barrie, I know the hotel and the area very well, let me know when you are in town and maybe we can meet up for a drink,. For the ISO 30 I will indeed take a closer look, thanks again for the information and hope to see you one day in Sunny Switzerland! Best wishes, Mark |
08/06/2020 13:04:51 |
Posted by Oily Rag on 08/06/2020 12:59:43:
Mark, As you are in Switzerland have you looked for an Aciera F2 or F3 mill? Or perhaps a Luthy mill? I would have thought you are in the right place to obtain, albeit second hand, probably one of the finest small universal mills that has ever been made! Good afternoon,
Yes I live in the Lausanne area, I have looked for a second hand Aciera but the ones I found were either in dire need of overhauling or were in great condition with prices that made my poor eyes water! The same was true when I looked for a small Swiss lathe, Schaublin lathes can be found but were not in my (or her) budgets! Best wishes, Mark |
08/06/2020 13:00:16 |
Posted by Oily Rag on 08/06/2020 11:39:54:
Seems strange that they are willing to ship 'other parts' but not a machine! Has anyone asked them for a machine to be broken down and shipped? That would seem to get around that problem. However I am sure you will not be disappointed in the Wabeco, Looks like your getting the genuine item rather than a Chinacom clone. Good afternoon, I understand more now that Ketan has clarified the situation regarding freight costs, I guess parts fall under certain weight limits so therefore are easier to deal with. I will let everyone know how the WABECO turns out, still working out the details of the order but it should be ordered by the end of the day,
Best wishes, Mark |
08/06/2020 12:56:10 |
Posted by Ketan Swali on 08/06/2020 12:39:53:
Hi Mark, Here is what we said in our email to you: ----------------------------------- ' Unfortunately, after speaking with our freight providers, we are not able to deliver machines to Switzerland. We are able to consider orders for machine accessories and tooling. Please accept our apologies that we have been unable to assist you on this occasion.' -------------------------------- ARC failed to elaborate on 'after speaking with our freight providers'.... so here are some more details.. We do not ship machines regularly to Switzerland, so we invited two quotes. One declined, and one quoted GB£450.00 + GB£60.00 for processing through Swiss customs. These quotes for Switzerland are excluding VAT. Also, there would have been local import duty/taxes (whatever they may be) to be paid by you on entry into Switzerland, as Switzerland is not part of EU for 'free circulation' of goods. We queried this quote as it seems expensive, and were told - it is correct. Keeping this in mind, the matter was brought to my attention. I felt that it was too expensive. Plus, based on past experience of things going 'pair shaped' specifically for machine shipments to Switzerland:
For ARC, the above problems are unique to Switzerland. We do not have the same problems to any other EU destinations, including Romania, Norway and Sweden - destinations to which we ship these and other machines - big or small, regularly. For Switzerland, we have to check what the situation is, at the time of enquiry. Based on all of the above, I decided to decline your order, so you got the email as you did. Perhaps the sender of the email from ARC should have clarified with more detail, but chances are that either way, you would have been unhappy with the response. As you say, life is too short. Apologies once again for the inconvenience. I hope you enjoy your new purchase of WABECO. Ketan at ARC. Hi Ketan, Thanks for replying, In hindsight I feel that I should have fully quoted your rely so sorry for my omission. However. as you rightly stated a quote of £500 would probably have not made my day Shipping to a country outside of the EU is full of surprises, I guess that the UK may get a taste of this once the details of BREXIT are finally signed off, hopefully it will not be too painful for either side! Best wishes to all, Mark |
08/06/2020 12:49:50 |
Posted by Barrie Lever on 08/06/2020 12:12:51:
Mark Did you confirm your order on the Wabeco yet? It is certainly worth upgrading to the ISO 30 spindle if the order is still open, I have a Wabeco 1210 and it is better with the ISO 30 spindle than the previous MT2. The ISO 30 tool holders have a lot more cross section and are thus stiffer, they also go back in a repeatable position in the Z axis, and release easier than MT 2 or 3 . There is a very high quality supplier of ISO 30 ER tool holders in Germany, they are called Kemmler, the holders are 51 euro's each plus VAT. Having said about releasing tool holders, the Wabeco has a very clever release system whichever spindle you have ordered, no hammering or stuck tool holders.
Where in Switzerland are you? Regards Barrie Edited By Barrie Lever on 08/06/2020 12:15:52
Hi Barry,
Many thanks for the information, the order has not been confirmed yet but my Lathe uses MT3 so I will be able share collets, chucks etc. This pushed me to pay extra for the WABECO MT3 option, however If I were starting again I would definitely go the more rigid route! I live just outside of Lausanne, are you in Switzerland! Best wishes and thanks again, Mark
Edited By JasonB on 08/06/2020 13:03:43 |
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.