Here is a list of all the postings Bob Wild has made in our forums. Click on a thread name to jump to the thread.
Thread: Model Steam Fire Engine 1908 Frank Finch |
14/07/2020 21:51:04 |
Hi. I stared on this model recently. I have described my progress so far in this thread : In the first post there is a link to Frank Finches article. You will be astonished by the lack of instructions and dimensions! But I did find a complete set of plans from Julius day Val. There is another guy called Werner who has also built a (slightly bigger) Fire King. He has described his impressive model on this site and has given me a few pointers. Hope this helps. Bob Edited By Bob Wild on 14/07/2020 21:52:33 |
Thread: Merryweather Fire King |
04/07/2020 12:54:48 |
THe only problem I have now is that 'Er Indoors wants to spend more time outdoors with the easing of the lockdown restrictions. So I'm taking her to the Yorkshire Dales in our caravan. Model Engineering on hold for a while |
04/07/2020 12:52:19 |
Here's the ball turning photo that I have been having such problems with: I'm actually quite proud of the attachment as it does just what I wanted. Bob |
04/07/2020 12:49:56 |
Thanks Werner, I'll bear that in mind. Bob |
Thread: What’s the tolerance?? |
04/07/2020 12:43:51 |
Well I didn't expect such a furore of responses, but it does make interesting reading. Thanks to everyone for their replies. Nigel, I should have been more explicit about my application. It is a Merryweather Fire King self propelled fire engine. It is described in my thread Merryweather Fire King Dave "If your engine was originally serialised in a magazine, then assembly, marking out and lining up was dealt with in the write up." There is a reference to the 1908 article in my thread, and I was astonished by the lack of guidance from the author, not to mention the lack of dimensions!
|
03/07/2020 23:50:23 |
Many years ago I were an ingineer. All drawings had a tolerance on each dimension. But now I’m building a steam engine where there are no tolerances at all on the drawings. It’s quite complicated as it is a twin cylinder and each is driving a water pump. My big concern is how to get them all lined up. Obviously the greater the clearance between the pistons and their cylinders the easier it is. So my big question is “How much clearance should there be between the piston and its cylinder”. Incidentally the bore is 3/4 in. Any suggestions from the experts would be most appreciated. Bob |
Thread: Merryweather Fire King |
03/07/2020 23:33:33 |
Posted by Werner Schleidt on 26/06/2020 16:21:41:
Hello Bob, take a look to this link there are a few good old pictures that was one source for me. Werner Thanks Werner. I will be happy if my machine is half as good as yours. I’ve got a copy of the Henderson book, and it does contain lots of interesting info. I’m going to try etching the nameplate as you have done, but I think that will be some time in the future. At the moment I’ve nearly finished the pumps and the cylinders. But I’m so worried about how to line everything thing up. I was thinking I might use some dummy pistons connected with a rod so I can bolt them all together. Then I can also clamp the pumps to the water cylinder. Bob
|
03/07/2020 21:28:58 |
The most interesting part of the water pump is the air cylinder. The original design was a bit boring so I decided to use the design of Tubal Cain which he used for his Lady Stephanie bean engine. This had a fluted cylinder and a relief valve.
Turning the end with my homemade ball turning attachment
The final assembly
|
02/07/2020 00:51:47 |
Next up the water pumps, a lot of machining here |
02/07/2020 00:47:09 |
Steering components Front assembly Thought I’d better paint the model so far. To stop it rusting and get a bit of Fire Engine Red !!! |
27/06/2020 22:50:03 |
My efforts at hardening and tempering spring steel were a disaster so I gave in and decided to make the leaf springs out of ms. This is my homemade bender which worked well I made a fixture to form the eyes And this is the result Finally I assembled both the front and rear suspensions and painted them.
|
26/06/2020 22:55:22 |
Posted by Werner Schleidt on 26/06/2020 16:21:41:
Hello Bob, take a look to this link there are a few good old pictures that was one source for me. Werner Thanks Werner. You’ve certainly built a great model and posted some great videos. I don’t think mine will be capable of riding on, but I would like it to be a working model. The boiler fills me with dread since there is so much silver soldering to do. But that is some time in the future. I am prepared to make a few compromises, for example since I have no castings the pumps will be prefabricated. Also not to happy about making the crankshaft with the valve eccentrics in the proper position. So I am going to use two Stuart 10V cylinders mounted back to back. By doing this I can fit the eccentrics from either end. Also I can’t imagine making the wheels in wood at my scale, so I will prefabricate them in steel. |
26/06/2020 22:33:06 |
Posted by V8Eng on 25/06/2020 23:56:06:
This guy has made an excellent one (not sure of relative models etc) and posts progress on this forum, it may be worth you contacting him by PM. I am putting a link here to his forum posts:- Edited By V8Eng on 26/06/2020 00:05:30 Thanks V8Eng. I’ve had a look at Werner’s posts - very interesting and helpful |
25/06/2020 22:39:18 |
I came across this article in a 1908 model engineering magazine: **LINK** My ambition always exceeds my ability so I thought I would share my progress and hopefully get some helpful advice from the experts here. My first problem was the fact that the drawings only contained a minimum of dimensions; not the sort of detail you would expect from today’s drawings. Fortunately I came across some detailed drawings from Julius de Vaal, so that was a relief, see below:
First the chassis. Not a problem so far, except the design called for channel section. I could only find some box section so I had to remove one side.
Next up the front and rear suspensions, more to follow
Bob |
Thread: New member |
03/12/2018 12:26:54 |
Posted by Pete Berry on 30/11/2018 14:11:19:
Hi Bob, I built lady Stephen some years ago and thought some part are like watch making. I did not think much of thr beam casting and fabricated one from mild steel. Go luck with your build. Regards Pete
Hello Pete. Yes I agree. The quality of the castings left a lot to be desired. The flywheel was full of inclusions and the entablature was way out of true. In the end I prefabricted the it and assigned the casting to the scrap bin ! Bob |
03/12/2018 12:23:45 |
Thank you all for your welcoming messages. Don't know where Herefordshire or Granthan are - somewhere down south presumably. We have a saying "Yorkshire born and Yorkshire bred, strong in the arm and good in bed".
I'll start a construction thread and post some photos of Lady Stephanie.
Bob |
28/11/2018 16:25:57 |
Have just returned to model engineering after I retired. The last time I did anything like this was in GCE metalwork at school many years ago. It's surprising how much you remember, and also how much you forget. My first project was a Stuart Turner 10H. I'm now on with a Lady Stephanie beam engine which is testing my patience to the extreme - so many 10 and 12 ba bolts. I'll try and publish some pics if I'm not too ashamed of my handywork. Bob |
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.